Posted by member 71746 on 2003-11-20 13:18:15 link
It does say so on the e-mail itself.. I'm not confused as to why this is happening or thinking it's a bug or anything, I just think people should have the option of being alerted to each reply, and have the contents of the reply in the e-mail,
Right now you have to scan your emails, click a link to bring up a browser, log into ls.net, click the link again to go to the thread, and only then be able to read the reply to see whether it was worth all that effort in the first place.
With those features enabled, you could just scan through your e-mails and if all the replies are things like "I agree" or "lol" then you don't have to bother with loading a browser or the login routine.
When I see room for more efficiency I like to set the wheels in motion to have that efficiency implemented and help things like litestep and ls.net achieve their full potential.
It might put more load on the server's e-mail bot, but it would result in less load on the web server and less load on each individual user who chooses to employ these features.
Right now you have to scan your emails, click a link to bring up a browser, log into ls.net, click the link again to go to the thread, and only then be able to read the reply to see whether it was worth all that effort in the first place.
With those features enabled, you could just scan through your e-mails and if all the replies are things like "I agree" or "lol" then you don't have to bother with loading a browser or the login routine.
When I see room for more efficiency I like to set the wheels in motion to have that efficiency implemented and help things like litestep and ls.net achieve their full potential.
It might put more load on the server's e-mail bot, but it would result in less load on the web server and less load on each individual user who chooses to employ these features.