Windows 2000 Thread last updated on 2003-04-13 06:39:39

Posted by member 12640 on 2003-04-12 13:04:51

Just about to start using litstep and just wondered if it works with Windows 2000... plus I'm using an NTFS file system on my primary partition... will that cock things up if it goes wrong and I need to restore my system.ini file?

Posted by member 1783 on 2003-04-12 13:34:54 link

yes ls works with 2000 :)
i really don't know about NTFS so don't blame me if sth goes wrong, but use omar's installer and you should be ok ;)

Posted by member 5120 on 2003-04-12 15:32:54 link

Litestep works fine under NTFS. At least for me. And there is no reason that it shouldn't.

Posted by member 99 on 2003-04-12 16:42:15 link

Windows 2000 doesn't use system.ini to specify the shell, it uses a bunch of registry keys. NTFS would make things difficult if something went horribly wrong, but that won't happen. You probably don't yet know enough about the system to screw it up.

Lots of people are running LiteStep on Win2k or XP with NTFS. (like me) It's all happy together.

Posted by member 1 on 2003-04-12 17:41:33 link

READ THE DOCS!!! ARGH!!!!

Posted by member 111 on 2003-04-12 18:22:40 link

%))
DeViLbOi forever!
The most popular his phrase... ggggg...

Posted by member 1 on 2003-04-12 20:07:16 link

It better be...I wrote a lot of the docs...especially the installation docs which I worked on with different people for about a month.

Posted by member 7223 on 2003-04-13 06:39:39 link

Really no problem with LS under Win2K and NTFS...
mo_roodi, you're welcome