Posted by member 5575 on 2006-10-26 12:06:44 link
Ahhh, Ok, that's why I couldn't see anything wrong - it wasn't in the .cpp file. =) All of the parameters are working fine now for me.
My (Litestep.exe) CPU use tends to go through the roof when I've got iTunes running and this module loaded though. If I unload it, while keeping everything else the same, CPU use returns to normal. I've got the info displaying on an xlabel (xlabel-4.0 with xPaintclass) that is hooked into another xlabel, no transparency or alphamapping used. I don't know if that might be making a difference or not.
Update: CPU use remained high even after I killed iTunes. Perhaps it has to do with the way the info is requested through the COM interface?
My (Litestep.exe) CPU use tends to go through the roof when I've got iTunes running and this module loaded though. If I unload it, while keeping everything else the same, CPU use returns to normal. I've got the info displaying on an xlabel (xlabel-4.0 with xPaintclass) that is hooked into another xlabel, no transparency or alphamapping used. I don't know if that might be making a difference or not.
Update: CPU use remained high even after I killed iTunes. Perhaps it has to do with the way the info is requested through the COM interface?