Posted by member 12025 on 2004-08-12 03:57:24 link
tnl: "You plan to have variables for all the possible combinations, per tmp ? And then the same for other things?"
No, I do not plan to. I already do, and have had for a couple months now.
With test as "vwm", these expand out "__border__bottom", to then become
Rabidcow: maybe, maybe not. I'll try it, being more cafeful...
I did not have good luck getting more than one additional expansion per line. Maybe I was missing a } or something when I tried. I went through making such a script because trying to get one more expansion out of a variable than possible sets the value to true.
No, I do not plan to. I already do, and have had for a couple months now.
vwm_grip 2
vwmStyle singlebrace
vwmthick 1
vwmStyle singlebrace
vwmthick 1
With test as "vwm", these expand out "__border__bottom", to then become
$singlebrace_1_border_2_bottom$
in the end, which is 1. This way every box can have independent settings, all from a single set of evars, and using only a few !bangs, with few special cases, to get it all done.Rabidcow: maybe, maybe not. I'll try it, being more cafeful...
I did not have good luck getting more than one additional expansion per line. Maybe I was missing a } or something when I tried. I went through making such a script because trying to get one more expansion out of a variable than possible sets the value to true.