Posted by member 69852 on 2003-11-02 13:36:34 link
Yep, that's what I read somewhere. There is no mystery about .NET in fact, the latest version of .NET was to introduce major enhancements for C++ along with J#. Porting LS to .NET wouldn't be a big effort and it would make the development and support for LS alot easier.
On another topic but one that is very close to the initial question spawning this thread is the fact that one doe not need to write a .NET module at all for Litestep. I am a SW development project manager with time on my hands. I would certainly like to offer a hand to the dev team should they want to consider the .NET porting option.
After some more reading, I came across a module called SendMessage on Shellfront.org. In theory, one could use this module to remote a .NET windows form or service app. using a set of messages that would emulate bangs.
Right now, I think this is the only way to work with .NET apps.
On another topic but one that is very close to the initial question spawning this thread is the fact that one doe not need to write a .NET module at all for Litestep. I am a SW development project manager with time on my hands. I would certainly like to offer a hand to the dev team should they want to consider the .NET porting option.
After some more reading, I came across a module called SendMessage on Shellfront.org. In theory, one could use this module to remote a .NET windows form or service app. using a set of messages that would emulate bangs.
Right now, I think this is the only way to work with .NET apps.