Litestep for... Mac? Thread last updated on 2007-01-19 11:22:52

Posted by member 134680 on 2006-06-13 21:03:30

Would this even be possible? Im going over in my head how you could even remotely try to do it..
Hmm, any comments?

Posted by member 212670 on 2006-06-13 21:18:33 link

This belongs in the LsBuilds forum! Stone him!

(No clue, I just wanted to have you stoned... hmm that sounds bad. Maybe a flogging would be better.)

Posted by member 1 on 2006-06-13 23:08:33 link

No. Litestep replaced the Windows Shell. It isn't like a Linux WM so it wouldn't work.

Posted by member 280260 on 2006-06-14 09:42:46 link

Is there any litestep-style shell for Linux environments? I'm thinking of making the switch, and Gnome and KDE just don't do it for me.

Posted by member 1885 on 2006-06-14 15:11:21 link

FVWM is quite advanced from what I've heard, but what I've seen of it hasn't impressed me. Still, that might be the themers, not the WM itself ;)

Posted by member 5575 on 2006-06-15 00:17:35 link

xcal, you've got some serious issues with this flogging thing.

Posted by member 134680 on 2007-01-18 20:33:20 link

I have been looking at this fink thing for osx that lets you use linux wm's on osx.
Perhaps that a step in the right direction? only thing holding me back from osx IS litestep.
-Ash

Posted by member 93947 on 2007-01-19 11:22:52 link

KDE and Gnome are actually desktop enviroments, not just shells (but both include their own shell). Enlightenment has probably the most eye-candy, but there are alot other shells ( Fluxbox, FVWM, etc )
Anyway i just changed my KDE shell untill it behaves like Litestep. Its quite flexible if you dig around in the config files ^^