Posted by member 313236 on 2006-03-15 16:54:27
Hi guys,
I just was curious to know what the RAM/CPU footprint size was like for LiteStep. I am currently running LS on my old laptop and its fine. However, I am interested in using it on my studio PC (I write music), where even the smallest differences in RAM/CPU usage can make everything run smoother.
In peoples opinion, would you say that LS generally places LESS or MORE strain on the host computers CPU & RAM than the original windows explorer shell?
All the best,
I just was curious to know what the RAM/CPU footprint size was like for LiteStep. I am currently running LS on my old laptop and its fine. However, I am interested in using it on my studio PC (I write music), where even the smallest differences in RAM/CPU usage can make everything run smoother.
In peoples opinion, would you say that LS generally places LESS or MORE strain on the host computers CPU & RAM than the original windows explorer shell?
All the best,