Posted by member 8104 on 2003-03-25 14:25:48 link
This is to all, and especially any dev people that might have influence in the developement of the installer. I found an <A HREF="http://www.litestep.net/index.php?section=4&action=view&catId=1&id=216">old thread</A> I had started where I had also posted a reg key that has to do with this:
HKLM_Software_Microsoft_Windows_CurrentVersion_Explorer_Advanced_Folder_DesktopProcess
In there is the DWord 'DefaultValue'. It is (or, was on my machine) set to 0. When I set LS up for a 'per user basis', it didn't work (ran explorer.exe whenever trying to browse directories) until I changed said DWord value to 1.
TO THE DEV PERSON WHO BUILDS THE INSTALLER:
If this were included in the installer, is there any reason to think that this might have adverse effects on >= machines as not having it does?
HKLM_Software_Microsoft_Windows_CurrentVersion_Explorer_Advanced_Folder_DesktopProcess
In there is the DWord 'DefaultValue'. It is (or, was on my machine) set to 0. When I set LS up for a 'per user basis', it didn't work (ran explorer.exe whenever trying to browse directories) until I changed said DWord value to 1.
TO THE DEV PERSON WHO BUILDS THE INSTALLER:
If this were included in the installer, is there any reason to think that this might have adverse effects on >= machines as not having it does?